Analisis Komparatif Tingkat Kepuasan Mahasiswa antar Jurusan di Politeknik Negeri Padang terhadap Pelayanan Pendidikan

  • Zahara Politeknik Negeri Padang
  • Eliyanora Politeknik Negeri Padang
  • Yossi Septriani Politeknik Negeri Padang
  • Zalida Afni Politeknik Negeri Padang
Keywords: Students’ Satisfactory Level, Gab, Educational Services, Standard of Quality Assurance Services

Abstract

This study is aimed at identifying students’ satisfactory levels toward educational services  provided by Politeknik Negeri Padang (PNP) and further determine whether there is a gap between their expectation and actual services that they receive. We define educational services as services provided by lecturers, administration staffs, and managerial officers. It is also included students’ perception on teaching-enhanced tools. The measurement of students’ satisfactory level is conducted using 5 variables, i.e reliability, responsiveness, assurance, empathy and tangible. Moreover, these variables are operationalised through several questions. All answers of these questions use likert scale within the range of 1 to 4. The score of students’ satisfactory level of PNP is further converted to the standard of Quality Assurance Services for government organizations, referring to KEPMENPAN No. KEP/25/M.PAN/2/2004. This study finds that educational services provided by PNP is reasonably good. There is a gap between students’ expectation level and actual services that they receive. On average, the score for their expectation is 3.71 whilst it is 2.59 for actual services (using the scale from 1 to 4). Of all departments in PNP, Accounting and Machinery Engineering has the lowest gap, 1.07 and 0.95 consecutively. Meanwhile, the highest gap occurs for Civil and Electrical Engineering, with score of  1.21. Overal, based on the Standard of Quality Assurance Services of KEPMENPAN No: KEP/25/M.PAN/2/2004, we conclude that students’ satisfactory level for PNP is in “B” category, indicating that the performance of its educational service is “good”.

References

Artawan, I Made,SE. (2002) Strategi Meningkatkan Mutu pendidikan di Perguruan Tinggi, Mutiara Cyber Network.
Budiono, Bambang,Dr.Ir.ME, (2003) Kebutuhan Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi Industri bagi Politeknik, Makalah pada Seminar Kurikulum Politeknik Negeri Padang, 4 Desember 2003.
Forum Komunikasi Jurusan Kesehatan Gigi Politeknik Kesehatan Depkes RI.(2002) Membangun Kurikulum berbasis kompetensi.
Indahwati, Rini, SE.,Ak.,M.Si, (2008) Pengukuran Kepuasan Mahasiswa terhadap Pelayanan Pendidikan di Jurusan Akuntansi Politeknik Negeri Medan, makalah Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XI.
Jogianto,H.M., Prof.,Dr.,M.B.A.,Akt. (2004) Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis, Salah Kaprah dan Pengalaman-Pengalaman, Yogyakarta : BPFE UGM.
Nasution, Zulkarimein (2003) Kualitas Pembelajaran di Universitas Meningkat?, artikel pada Pikiran Rakyat, Rabu 17 September 2003.
Suwardjono, Dr, (2004). Perilaku Belajar di Perguruan Tinggi, Makalah Seri Pendidikan, Yogyakarta.
Xiao, Z.Z. and Dyson, J.R. (1999) Chinese students’ perception of good accounting teaching. Accounting Education, 8(4) 341-361, Taylor & Francis Ltd, http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Zahara, SE.,Ak and Rafi, M., SE., Ak (2005). Persepsi Mahasiswa Jurusan Akuntansi Politeknik Negeri Padang tentang Good Accounting Teaching, Makalah penelitian DIPA Politeknik Negeri Padang.
Published
2015-06-01
How to Cite
Zahara, Eliyanora, Septriani, Y., & Afni, Z. (2015). Analisis Komparatif Tingkat Kepuasan Mahasiswa antar Jurusan di Politeknik Negeri Padang terhadap Pelayanan Pendidikan. Akuntansi Dan Manajemen, 10(1), 47-57. https://doi.org/10.30630/jam.v10i1.111